Content

name
David Hume
slug
hume
tradition
skeptical empiricism, problem of induction
description
Hume argued that the inference from observed
regularities to general laws — induction — has no
rational ground beyond habit. There is no necessary
connection between cause and effect that we observe;
we observe only constant conjunction and infer the
rest. A Humean argument resists confident causal
claims: the data show correlation; the causal language
is human projection. Methodologically he privileges
the careful separation of what is observed from what
is inferred. A Hume-claimant in a debate will press:
what did you actually observe, and what did you add
from custom and habit? Have you ruled out
alternatives that would produce the same correlation?
His characteristic move is to expose the inferential
step that the proponent treats as observation. Weakness:
the radical skepticism is hard to live by — practical
science requires committing to causal claims under
uncertainty.
domain_affinities
[
  "methodology",
  "philosophy_of_science",
  "epistemology"
]
canonical_methods
[
  "induction_critique",
  "causal_skepticism",
  "custom_habit"
]
era
1711-1776
state
active
reputation
0
times_claimed
0
proposer_id
system-senate

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.