{
"papers": [
{
"doi": "10.1038/nature12676",
"value": "VIP preferentially inhibits SST across auditory, mPFC, visual cortex",
"method": "in vivo electrophysiology and optogenetics",
"metric": "VIP-SST disinhibition engagement",
"cite_key": "Pi2013",
"condition": "reward/punishment signals",
"study_system": "mouse auditory, mPFC, visual cortex",
"value_source_sentence": "Cortical interneurons that specialize in disinhibitory control"
},
{
"doi": "10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.050",
"value": "Locomotion activates VIP which inhibits SST and disinhibits pyramidal cells",
"method": "in vivo calcium imaging",
"metric": "VIP-SST engagement during locomotion",
"cite_key": "Fu2014",
"condition": "locomotion",
"study_system": "mouse V1",
"value_source_sentence": "locomotion activates VIP interneurons, which inhibit a second class of interneurons, the somatostatin (SST) cells, resulting in disinhibition"
},
{
"doi": "10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.037",
"value": "Disinhibitory model fails when visual stimulation is added to locomotion",
"method": "in vivo two-photon imaging and modeling",
"metric": "Disinhibition model failure with visual stimulation",
"cite_key": "Dipoppa2018",
"condition": "locomotion + visual stimulation",
"study_system": "mouse V1",
"value_source_sentence": "the disinhibitory model failed when visual stimulation was added to locomotion"
},
{
"doi": "10.1101/2022.11.28.518253",
"value": "Attention and VIP disinhibition are orthogonal (non-interacting)",
"method": "all-optical methods with attention task",
"metric": "Attention vs disinhibition interaction",
"cite_key": "MyersJoseph2022",
"condition": "attention task",
"study_system": "mouse V1",
"value_source_sentence": "their effects were orthogonal"
},
{
"doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.1369-21.2021",
"value": "VIP→SST disinhibition gates LTP in piriform cortex",
"method": "in vitro optogenetics",
"metric": "VIP-SST disinhibition in olfactory cortex",
"cite_key": "CantoBustos2022",
"condition": "LTP induction",
"study_system": "mouse piriform cortex",
"value_source_sentence": "VIP interneurons strongly inhibit putative SST cells during LTP induction"
},
{
"doi": "10.1016/j.neuron.2024.02.008",
"value": "Behavioral strategy determines VIP-SST circuit engagement",
"method": "in vivo imaging and behavior",
"metric": "Strategy-dependent VIP-SST engagement",
"cite_key": "Piet2024",
"condition": "different behavioral strategies",
"study_system": "mouse cortex",
"value_source_sentence": "Behavioral strategy shapes activation of the Vip-Sst disinhibitory circuit"
}
],
"comparison_id": "vip-sst-disinhibition-across-areas",
"comparison_name": "VIP→SST Disinhibitory Circuit Engagement Across Cortical Areas and Contexts",
"comparison_type": "cross-study conflict",
"what_it_reveals": "The VIP→SST disinhibition motif is found across cortical areas but its engagement varies with behavioral context, challenging the notion of a universal, always-active disinhibitory module.",
"homogeneity_check": {
"caveats": [
"Different cortical areas",
"Different behavioral paradigms",
"Mix of in vivo and in vitro",
"Different metrics for disinhibition strength"
],
"comparable": false
},
"suggested_plot_type": "grouped bar"
}