Details

kind
infographic
prompt
VIP disinhibition effect sizes across studies
provider
other
section_id
section_06_evidence
source_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationReviewInhibitory/blob/934e0675cc6d5ffd9978a4a9883b31166ce000e2/evidence/section_06_evidence.json
target_ref
wiki_page:computationreviewinhibitory-06
review_repo
ComputationReviewInhibitory
section_ref
wiki_page:computationreviewinhibitory-06
source_path
evidence/section_06_evidence.json
section_title
VIP Interneuron Function and Disinhibition
generation_status
complete
review_bundle_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-5fc3c0c0505b
origin_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationReviewInhibitory/blob/934e0675cc6d5ffd9978a4a9883b31166ce000e2/evidence/section_06_evidence.json
commit_sha
934e0675cc6d5ffd9978a4a9883b31166ce000e2
created_by
persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience
repository_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationReviewInhibitory
Raw fields (3)
raw_fields
{
  "papers": [
    {
      "n": null,
      "doi": "10.7554/elife.05558",
      "value": "1 (from abstract context)",
      "cite_key": "Fu2015",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "In previous work, we have shown that locomotion dramatically enhances neural activity in the visual cortex (V1) of the mouse (Niell and Stryker, 2010), identified the cortical circuit responsible for this enhancement (Fu et al., 2014), and shown that locomotion also dramatically enhances adult plasticity (Kaneko and Stryker, 2014)."
    },
    {
      "n": 3812,
      "doi": "10.7554/elife.85893.sa0",
      "value": "40% of",
      "cite_key": "Nelson2023a",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "INs that express the Ca2+ binding protein parvalbumin (PV), which account for ~40% of the GABAergic INs in neocortex, exhibit fast-spiking properties, with most projecting their axons to form perisomatic baskets on nearby pyramidal neuron soma (Hu et al., 2014)."
    },
    {
      "n": 3812,
      "doi": "10.7554/elife.85893.sa1",
      "value": "40% of",
      "cite_key": "Nelson2023b",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "INs that express the Ca2+ binding protein parvalbumin (PV), which account for ~40% of the GABAergic INs in neocortex, exhibit fast-spiking properties, with most projecting their axons to form perisomatic baskets on nearby pyramidal neuron soma (Hu et al., 2014)."
    },
    {
      "n": 1059,
      "doi": "10.7554/elife.57749.sa2",
      "value": "97% of",
      "cite_key": "Granger2020",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "We confirmed that Cre expression faithfully reports Chat expression in cerebral cortex using fluorescent in situ hybdrization (FISH), with 97% of Chat+ neurons expressing Cre and 100% of Cre+ neurons expressing Chat (Figure 1B)."
    },
    {
      "n": 1124,
      "doi": "10.7554/elife.14985.013",
      "value": "4% of",
      "cite_key": "Pakan2016b",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "During visual stimulation, 47 ± 4% of excitatory neurons were significantly locomotion responsive (see Materials and methods for locomotion responsive criteria), compared with 28 ± 4% in darkness."
    },
    {
      "n": 5,
      "doi": "10.1113/jp288309",
      "value": "5 (from abstract context)",
      "cite_key": "Preuss2026",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "Layer (L) 5 is a hub in the cortical column in which a multitude of feedforward and feedback pathways converge."
    },
    {
      "n": null,
      "doi": "10.1111/apha.70162",
      "value": "4 (from abstract context)",
      "cite_key": "Jabonska2026",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "<h4>Aim</h4>Control of synaptic inhibition at the network level is essential for neuronal computation; however, the mechanism by which inhibitory I → I synapses between interneurons adjust their strength remains unclear."
    },
    {
      "n": 65,
      "doi": "10.1038/s41598-018-30958-w",
      "value": "1 (from abstract context)",
      "cite_key": "Camillo2018",
      "n_definition": "varies - mice, neurons, or recordings",
      "scope_region": "varies by study",
      "scope_population": "VIP interneurons",
      "value_source_sentence": "The largest group of interneurons in the upper layers of mouse primary visual cortex (V1) is formed by cells expressing the calcium-binding protein calretinin (CR)."
    }
  ],
  "x_axis": "Study / Cortical Area",
  "y_axis": "Effect size (varied metrics)",
  "n_analyzed": "varies",
  "n_definition": "varies across studies",
  "scope_region": "multiple cortical areas",
  "comparison_name": "VIP disinhibition effect sizes across studies",
  "comparison_type": "cross_study",
  "taxonomic_level": "VIP Cre-defined population (not subtype-resolved)",
  "scope_population": "VIP interneurons and their postsynaptic targets",
  "homogeneity_check": {
    "caveats": [
      "Effect sizes measured with different metrics (percent change, fold change, spike rate change)",
      "Different cortical areas studied",
      "Different behavioral states (anesthetized vs awake vs locomoting)",
      "Different stimulation protocols (optogenetic power, duration)",
      "n_definition varies across studies (mice vs neurons vs recordings)"
    ],
    "comparable": false
  }
}
source_refs
[
  "paper:paper-04b31a19dae3",
  "paper:paper-435d954ea744",
  "paper:paper-737e539c1091",
  "paper:paper-7a7dbf08f388",
  "paper:paper-ce31bd4648d0",
  "paper:paper-e012a8b94c60",
  "paper:paper-f22eb24f5525",
  "paper:paper-f842a578a511"
]
source_policy
{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "934e0675cc6d5ffd9978a4a9883b31166ce000e2",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationReviewInhibitory"
}

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.