Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live 58fa1fde9e4f
    5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "kind": "infographic",
      "prompt": "3. Paired-recording evidence in mouse — connection probabilities and synaptic strengths between pyramidal cells within a column, layer-by-layer (Lefort, Petersen, Adesnik, Feldmeyer, Markram-style work in mouse) figure 3",
      "provider": "other",
      "raw_fields": {
        "id": "projection_class_specific_EE_matrix",
        "type": "projection-class connectivity matrix",
        "description": "Connection probability and bias of E->E connections by long-range projection class (IT, PT, CT) in mouse cortex.",
        "audit_issues": [
          {
            "dimension": "metric_definition",
            "description": "Sources describe projection-target-specific E→E connectivity at different resolutions (corticospinal/corticostriatal segregation, full CT/IT/PT motif matrix, hierarchical M1 wiring, L5 projection-class diversity). Reported quantities are not identical but address overlapping pieces of the same matrix.",
            "entries_affected": [
              "10.1038/nn.2701",
              "10.1038/nature07658",
              "10.1523/jneurosci.4023-14.2015",
              "10.1523/jneurosci.4759-11.2012",
              "10.3389/fncel.2013.00174"
            ]
          },
          {
            "dimension": "scope_population",
            "description": "Some entries probe broad CT/IT/PT classes; others probe L5 projection diversity at finer Cre-line resolution. Plotting on a single matrix risks conflating resolutions.",
            "entries_affected": [
              "10.1038/nn.2701",
              "10.1038/nature07658",
              "10.1523/jneurosci.4023-14.2015",
              "10.1523/jneurosci.4759-11.2012",
              "10.3389/fncel.2013.00174"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "audit_verdict": "CAVEAT",
        "section_targets": [
          "section_03"
        ],
        "comparable_sources": [
          {
            "doi": "10.1038/nature07658",
            "pmid": "19151698",
            "what": "Brown/Hestrin 2009 — projection-target-specific pyramidal-pyramidal connectivity"
          },
          {
            "doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.4023-14.2015",
            "pmid": "25653383",
            "what": "Yamawaki/Shepherd 2015 mouse M1 CT/IT/PT motifs"
          },
          {
            "doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.4759-11.2012",
            "pmid": "22492054",
            "what": "Kiritani/Shepherd 2012 hierarchical M1 corticospinal-corticostriatal"
          },
          {
            "doi": "10.3389/fncel.2013.00174",
            "pmid": "24137110",
            "what": "Suter 2013 — mouse M1 L5 diversity of projection neuron classes"
          }
        ],
        "primary_source_doi": "10.1038/nn.2701",
        "primary_source_pmid": "20436481",
        "notes_for_extraction": "Cross-comparison of E->E P(connection) and amplitude by projection target: Anderson/Shepherd 2010 (M1 L2/3→L5 CSp vs CSt), Brown/Hestrin 2009 (projection-target dependence), Yamawaki/Shepherd 2015 (CT vs IT vs PT in M1 L6), Otsuka/Kawaguchi-style L5 motor diversity (24137110).",
        "claim_source_sentence": "The main excitatory pathway in mouse motor cortex, layer 2/3->5, is fractionated into distinct pathways targeting corticospinal and corticostriatal neurons.",
        "audit_fabrication_flag": "Label 'Suter 2013' on DOI 10.3389/fncel.2013.00174 does not match DOI authors (Tantirigama, Sonntag, Hughes, Empson, Oswald). The Suter & Shepherd 2013 paper that the label likely intends is at a different DOI. Coordinator should reconcile.",
        "mandatory_caption_caveats": [
          "Entries report different slices of the M1 projection-class connectivity matrix (corticospinal/corticostriatal segregation, CT/IT/PT motifs, L5 sub-diversity) — values are complementary, not directly equivalent.",
          "Verify the 'Suter 2013' label on DOI 10.3389/fncel.2013.00174 (DOI maps to Tantirigama et al. 2013, not Suter)."
        ]
      },
      "section_id": "section_03",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json",
      "target_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-03-paired-recording",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-03-paired-recording",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [],
      "section_title": "3. Paired-recording evidence in mouse — connection probabilities and synaptic strengths between pyramidal cells within a column, layer-by-layer (Lefort, Petersen, Adesnik, Feldmeyer, Markram-style work in mouse)",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
      },
      "generation_status": "complete",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
    }