Details

kind
infographic
prompt
Astrocyte Calcium Signaling figure 3
provider
other
section_id
section_03_evidence_package
source_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes/blob/1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e/evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json
target_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewastrocytes-03
review_repo
ComputationalReviewAstrocytes
section_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewastrocytes-03
source_path
evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json
section_title
Astrocyte Calcium Signaling
generation_status
complete
review_bundle_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-029ee9411fe2
origin_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes/blob/1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e/evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json
commit_sha
1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e
created_by
persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience
repository_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes
Raw fields (3)
raw_fields
{
  "papers": [
    {
      "doi": "10.1371/journal.pone.0181113",
      "note": "Ye et al 2017: GCaMP6f has faster kinetics than GCaMP3 but similar peak amplitude in awake-mouse astrocytes",
      "value": "GCaMP6f: 35.2±2.0 %/s rise, 7.11±0.29 s time-to-peak; GCaMP3: 27.9±1.8 %/s rise, 8.58±0.45 s (p<0.05)",
      "indicator": "GCaMP6f vs GCaMP3 (paired comparison)",
      "measurements": [
        {
          "value": "rise rate 35.2 ± 2.0 %/s; time-to-peak 7.11 ± 0.29 s (n=8 mice)",
          "indicator": "GCaMP6f",
          "value_source_sentence": "Indeed, GCaMP6f fluorescent transients had a larger maximum rate of rise (35.2 ± 2.0% of peak / s; 8 mice) than GCaMP3 fluorescent transients (27.9 ± 1.8% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.014), and there was a trend towards a faster maximum rate of fluorescence decay of GCaMP6f signals (-26.2 ± 2.1% of peak / s; 8 mice) compared to GCaMP3 (-22.3 ± 1.4% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.094)."
        },
        {
          "value": "rise rate 27.9 ± 1.8 %/s; time-to-peak 8.58 ± 0.45 s (n=9 mice)",
          "indicator": "GCaMP3",
          "value_source_sentence": "Consistent with these kinetic parameters, GCaMP6f signals reached the peak response sooner following onset of locomotion (7.11 ± 0.29 s; 8 mice) than GCaMP3 signals (8.58 ± 0.45 s; 9 mice, p = 0.017) ( Fig 1F and 1H )."
        }
      ],
      "value_source_sentence": "Indeed, GCaMP6f fluorescent transients had a larger maximum rate of rise (35.2 ± 2.0% of peak / s; 8 mice) than GCaMP3 fluorescent transients (27.9 ± 1.8% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.014), and there was a trend towards a faster maximum rate of fluorescence decay of GCaMP6f signals (-26.2 ± 2.1% of peak / s; 8 mice) compared to GCaMP3 (-22.3 ± 1.4% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.094)."
    },
    {
      "doi": "10.1085/jgp.201210949",
      "note": "Shigetomi 2013: membrane-targeted Lck-GCaMP exposes process microdomains invisible to cytosolic GCaMP",
      "value": "cyto-GCaMP3 + Lck-GCaMP3 detect ~60–90 Ca2+ signals per astrocyte/5 min vs ~8 with Fluo-4AM (≈7–11× more)",
      "indicator": "Lck-GCaMP3 / cyto-GCaMP3",
      "value_source_sentence": "Both cyto-GCaMP3 and Lck-GCaMP3 were far superior to Fluo-4AM, and there was a trend for Lck-GCaMP3 to detect more Ca 2+ signals than cyto-GCaMP3 ( Fig. 8, B and C )."
    },
    {
      "doi": "10.1002/glia.23042",
      "note": "Agarwal 2017 / Rungta 2016 style paper: microdomain vs somatic kinetics",
      "value": "Process Ca2+ transients dependent on Ca2+ influx (abolished by extracellular Ca2+ removal); intact in IP3R2-KO",
      "indicator": "GCaMP6s in fine processes",
      "value_source_sentence": "Removal of extracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> almost completely and reversibly abolished the spontaneous signals while IP<sub>3</sub> R2 KO mice also exhibited spontaneous and compartmentalized signals, suggesting they rely on influx of extracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup>."
    }
  ],
  "axis_label": "Maximum rate of rise (% of peak / s) and time-to-peak (s)",
  "comparison_topic": "Performance of GCaMP variants for astrocyte Ca2+ imaging (kinetic parameters, signal-to-noise)"
}
source_refs
[
  "paper:paper-b7b6019e29af",
  "paper:paper-c4ac0d62b042",
  "paper:paper-daae60fbce4a"
]
source_policy
{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes"
}

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.