Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live 6d635e91fab0
    5/17/2026, 4:45:12 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "kind": "infographic",
      "prompt": "Astrocyte Calcium Signaling figure 3",
      "provider": "other",
      "raw_fields": {
        "papers": [
          {
            "doi": "10.1371/journal.pone.0181113",
            "note": "Ye et al 2017: GCaMP6f has faster kinetics than GCaMP3 but similar peak amplitude in awake-mouse astrocytes",
            "value": "GCaMP6f: 35.2±2.0 %/s rise, 7.11±0.29 s time-to-peak; GCaMP3: 27.9±1.8 %/s rise, 8.58±0.45 s (p<0.05)",
            "indicator": "GCaMP6f vs GCaMP3 (paired comparison)",
            "measurements": [
              {
                "value": "rise rate 35.2 ± 2.0 %/s; time-to-peak 7.11 ± 0.29 s (n=8 mice)",
                "indicator": "GCaMP6f",
                "value_source_sentence": "Indeed, GCaMP6f fluorescent transients had a larger maximum rate of rise (35.2 ± 2.0% of peak / s; 8 mice) than GCaMP3 fluorescent transients (27.9 ± 1.8% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.014), and there was a trend towards a faster maximum rate of fluorescence decay of GCaMP6f signals (-26.2 ± 2.1% of peak / s; 8 mice) compared to GCaMP3 (-22.3 ± 1.4% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.094)."
              },
              {
                "value": "rise rate 27.9 ± 1.8 %/s; time-to-peak 8.58 ± 0.45 s (n=9 mice)",
                "indicator": "GCaMP3",
                "value_source_sentence": "Consistent with these kinetic parameters, GCaMP6f signals reached the peak response sooner following onset of locomotion (7.11 ± 0.29 s; 8 mice) than GCaMP3 signals (8.58 ± 0.45 s; 9 mice, p = 0.017) ( Fig 1F and 1H )."
              }
            ],
            "value_source_sentence": "Indeed, GCaMP6f fluorescent transients had a larger maximum rate of rise (35.2 ± 2.0% of peak / s; 8 mice) than GCaMP3 fluorescent transients (27.9 ± 1.8% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.014), and there was a trend towards a faster maximum rate of fluorescence decay of GCaMP6f signals (-26.2 ± 2.1% of peak / s; 8 mice) compared to GCaMP3 (-22.3 ± 1.4% of peak / s; 9 mice, p = 0.094)."
          },
          {
            "doi": "10.1085/jgp.201210949",
            "note": "Shigetomi 2013: membrane-targeted Lck-GCaMP exposes process microdomains invisible to cytosolic GCaMP",
            "value": "cyto-GCaMP3 + Lck-GCaMP3 detect ~60–90 Ca2+ signals per astrocyte/5 min vs ~8 with Fluo-4AM (≈7–11× more)",
            "indicator": "Lck-GCaMP3 / cyto-GCaMP3",
            "value_source_sentence": "Both cyto-GCaMP3 and Lck-GCaMP3 were far superior to Fluo-4AM, and there was a trend for Lck-GCaMP3 to detect more Ca 2+ signals than cyto-GCaMP3 ( Fig. 8, B and C )."
          },
          {
            "doi": "10.1002/glia.23042",
            "note": "Agarwal 2017 / Rungta 2016 style paper: microdomain vs somatic kinetics",
            "value": "Process Ca2+ transients dependent on Ca2+ influx (abolished by extracellular Ca2+ removal); intact in IP3R2-KO",
            "indicator": "GCaMP6s in fine processes",
            "value_source_sentence": "Removal of extracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> almost completely and reversibly abolished the spontaneous signals while IP<sub>3</sub> R2 KO mice also exhibited spontaneous and compartmentalized signals, suggesting they rely on influx of extracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup>."
          }
        ],
        "axis_label": "Maximum rate of rise (% of peak / s) and time-to-peak (s)",
        "comparison_topic": "Performance of GCaMP variants for astrocyte Ca2+ imaging (kinetic parameters, signal-to-noise)"
      },
      "section_id": "section_03_evidence_package",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes/blob/1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e/evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json",
      "target_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewastrocytes-03",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewAstrocytes",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewastrocytes-03",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [
        "paper:paper-b7b6019e29af",
        "paper:paper-c4ac0d62b042",
        "paper:paper-daae60fbce4a"
      ],
      "section_title": "Astrocyte Calcium Signaling",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes"
      },
      "generation_status": "complete",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-029ee9411fe2",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes/blob/1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e/evidence/section_03_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "1a55da0634a3bc04e5688792ed12141ce271d28e",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAstrocytes"
    }