Details

kind
infographic
provider
other
section_id
section_09_evidence_package
source_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST/blob/89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1/evidence/section_09_evidence_package.json
target_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewsst-09
review_repo
ComputationalReviewSST
section_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewsst-09
source_path
evidence/section_09_evidence_package.json
section_title
Hippocampal SST Interneurons
generation_status
complete
review_bundle_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-8466d095488a
origin_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST/blob/89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1/evidence/section_09_evidence_package.json
commit_sha
89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1
created_by
persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience
repository_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST
Raw fields (4)
prompt
Hippocampal SST subtypes have fundamentally different connectivity: O-LM cells target distal dendrites in SLM, bistratified cells target proximal dendrites in SR/SO, and Sst;;Tac1 bistratified cells specifically target fast-spiking interneurons. These connectivity differences predict distinct circuit functions that cannot be captured by bulk SST manipulation.
raw_fields
{
  "papers": [
    {
      "doi": "10.1073/pnas.2306382121",
      "value": "Sst;;Tac1 bistratified: 85% IPSCs in pyramidal cells, selectively interrupt FS-INs; OLM (Ndnf;;Nkx2-1): 0% FS-IN interruption",
      "method": "paired recordings + optogenetics",
      "metric": "Postsynaptic target selectivity",
      "cite_key": "Chamberland2024",
      "condition": "in vitro CA1",
      "study_system": "mouse",
      "value_source_sentence": "The summed subgroup events represented 85% of the IPSC in CA1-PYRs directly recorded upon by optogenetic stimulation of the general Sst-IN population; for FS-INs, the corresponding percentage was 75%. We found that photostimulation of subgroups failed to induce the interruption of firing in the case of Ndnf;;Nkx2-1-INs (0% likelihood, n = 5), Chrna2-INs (0.9 ± 0.8% likelihood, n = 11)."
    },
    {
      "doi": "10.3389/fnsyn.2014.00023",
      "value": "O-LM: stratum lacunosum-moleculare (distal); Bistratified: strata radiatum and oriens (proximal)",
      "method": "morphological + computational",
      "metric": "Dendritic domain targeting",
      "cite_key": "MAller2014",
      "condition": "CA1 circuit",
      "study_system": "rat/mouse",
      "value_source_sentence": "Dendritic inhibition mediated by O-LM and bistratified interneurons in the hippocampus."
    },
    {
      "doi": "10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00302-9",
      "value": "SST+ axon terminals preferentially contact dendrites of pyramidal cells",
      "method": "electron microscopy",
      "metric": "Electron microscopy targets",
      "cite_key": "Katona1999",
      "condition": "CA1",
      "study_system": "rat",
      "value_source_sentence": "Postsynaptic targets of somatostatin-immunoreactive interneurons in the rat hippocampus."
    },
    {
      "doi": "10.1093/cercor/bhaa359",
      "value": "O-LM: <20% responsive; PV/VIP: >70% responsive",
      "method": "optogenetics + patch clamp",
      "metric": "Input responsiveness to alvear pathway",
      "cite_key": "Bell2021",
      "condition": "in vitro CA1",
      "study_system": "mouse",
      "value_source_sentence": "alvear excitatory synaptic responses were observed in greater than 70% of PV and VIP interneurons and less than 20% of O-LM cells."
    }
  ],
  "comparison_id": "sst-subtype-connectivity-comparison",
  "comparison_name": "Connectivity Patterns of Hippocampal SST Interneuron Subtypes",
  "comparison_type": "convergent evidence",
  "what_it_reveals": "Hippocampal SST subtypes have fundamentally different connectivity: O-LM cells target distal dendrites in SLM, bistratified cells target proximal dendrites in SR/SO, and Sst;;Tac1 bistratified cells specifically target fast-spiking interneurons. These connectivity differences predict distinct circuit functions that cannot be captured by bulk SST manipulation.",
  "homogeneity_check": {
    "caveats": "Mixed species (rat and mouse), different methods (EM, paired recordings, optogenetics). Core finding of distinct dendritic targeting domains is consistent across approaches.",
    "comparable": true,
    "n_definition": "individual cells or connections",
    "scope_region": "CA1",
    "taxonomic_level": "subtype-specific",
    "scope_population": "SST+ interneuron subtypes"
  },
  "suggested_plot_type": "heatmap"
}
source_refs
[
  "paper:paper-bec9f93b6eaf",
  "paper:paper-de14fd3d41ad",
  "paper:paper-cf171ce288a9",
  "paper:paper-ffdd928a6c0b"
]
source_policy
{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST"
}

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.