{
"papers": [
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.3646-15.2016",
"value": "~120 μm",
"method": "two-photon optogenetics + calcium imaging",
"metric": "VIP lateral disinhibition effective range",
"n_analyzed": "",
"ci_or_error": "",
"text_access": "abstract_only",
"n_definition": "single VIP optogenetic activation experiments",
"scope_region": "visual cortex",
"study_system": "mouse visual cortex",
"taxonomic_level": "VIP interneurons",
"scope_population": "VIP interneurons and their SOM/pyramidal targets",
"value_source_sentence": "We find that VIPs break open a hole in blanket inhibition with an effective range of ~120 μm in lateral cortical space where excitatory activity can propagate.",
"experimental_conditions": "in vivo two-photon optogenetics of individual VIP interneurons"
},
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.013",
"value": "Synaptic weights specifically tuned to response similarity",
"method": "in vivo recording + connectivity measurement",
"metric": "PV inhibitory weight tuning by response similarity",
"n_analyzed": "",
"ci_or_error": "",
"text_access": "fulltext",
"n_definition": "in vivo visual responses + synaptic connectivity measurements",
"scope_region": "primary visual cortex",
"study_system": "mouse primary visual cortex",
"taxonomic_level": "PV+ interneurons",
"scope_population": "PV+ to pyramidal neuron connections",
"value_source_sentence": "Individual PV+ cells strongly inhibit those pyramidal cells that provide them with strong excitation and share their visual selectivity.",
"experimental_conditions": "in vivo, combined visual response and connectivity measurement"
},
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1093/cercor/bhx276",
"value": "Nonselective connections with both projection subtypes",
"method": "paired intracellular recordings",
"metric": "PV/FS connectivity selectivity for pyramidal subtypes",
"n_analyzed": "",
"ci_or_error": "",
"text_access": "fulltext",
"n_definition": "paired recordings between identified cell types",
"scope_region": "frontal cortex layer 5",
"study_system": "rat frontal cortex layer 5",
"taxonomic_level": "FS/PV cells",
"scope_population": "FS cells to CPn and CCS pyramidal subtypes",
"value_source_sentence": "FS cells made nonselective connections with both projection subtypes.",
"experimental_conditions": "in vitro paired recordings, identified projection subtypes"
},
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.5158-11.2012",
"value": "85-114 μm Gaussian sigma, comparable for all types",
"method": "multiple intracellular recordings",
"metric": "Connectivity spread FS vs excitatory cells",
"n_analyzed": "",
"ci_or_error": "",
"text_access": "abstract_only",
"n_definition": "multiple intracellular recording distance-connectivity mapping",
"scope_region": "primary auditory cortex",
"study_system": "mouse primary auditory cortex",
"taxonomic_level": "FS, non-FS, and excitatory neurons",
"scope_population": "all cell types in thalamorecipient layer",
"value_source_sentence": "The spread of connectivity, parameterized by Gaussian fits to the data, was comparable for all cell types, ranging from 85 to 114 μm.",
"experimental_conditions": "in vitro, multiple intracellular recordings"
}
],
"comparison_id": "blanket-vs-selective-inhibition-evidence",
"comparison_name": "Blanket vs Selective Inhibition: Evidence Across Studies",
"comparison_type": "cross-study conflict",
"what_it_reveals": "The evidence reveals a nuanced picture where PV connectivity is anatomically dense but functionally tuned. Connection probability may be high (blanket-like) but synaptic weights are modulated by activity and co-tuning, creating selective inhibition within a framework of dense connectivity. Whether PV inhibition appears selective or nonselective may depend on the level of analysis (connectivity vs synaptic weight), brain region, and experimental conditions.",
"homogeneity_check": {
"caveats": [
"Different brain regions (visual, auditory, frontal cortex)",
"Different species (mouse, rat)",
"Different experimental approaches (in vivo vs in vitro)",
"Blanket/selective distinction measured at different levels: connectivity rate vs synaptic weight"
],
"n_definition_uniform": "false",
"scope_region_uniform": "false",
"taxonomic_level_uniform": "true",
"scope_population_uniform": "false"
},
"suggested_plot_type": "heatmap"
}