Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live 0fbee1e21ce6
    5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "kind": "infographic",
      "prompt": "The evidence reveals a nuanced picture where PV connectivity is anatomically dense but functionally tuned. Connection probability may be high (blanket-like) but synaptic weights are modulated by activity and co-tuning, creating selective inhibition within a framework of dense connectivity. Whether PV inhibition appears selective or nonselective may depend on the level of analysis (connectivity vs synaptic weight), brain region, and experimental conditions.",
      "provider": "other",
      "raw_fields": {
        "papers": [
          {
            "n": 0,
            "doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.3646-15.2016",
            "value": "~120 μm",
            "method": "two-photon optogenetics + calcium imaging",
            "metric": "VIP lateral disinhibition effective range",
            "n_analyzed": "",
            "ci_or_error": "",
            "text_access": "abstract_only",
            "n_definition": "single VIP optogenetic activation experiments",
            "scope_region": "visual cortex",
            "study_system": "mouse visual cortex",
            "taxonomic_level": "VIP interneurons",
            "scope_population": "VIP interneurons and their SOM/pyramidal targets",
            "value_source_sentence": "We find that VIPs break open a hole in blanket inhibition with an effective range of ~120 μm in lateral cortical space where excitatory activity can propagate.",
            "experimental_conditions": "in vivo two-photon optogenetics of individual VIP interneurons"
          },
          {
            "n": 0,
            "doi": "10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.013",
            "value": "Synaptic weights specifically tuned to response similarity",
            "method": "in vivo recording + connectivity measurement",
            "metric": "PV inhibitory weight tuning by response similarity",
            "n_analyzed": "",
            "ci_or_error": "",
            "text_access": "fulltext",
            "n_definition": "in vivo visual responses + synaptic connectivity measurements",
            "scope_region": "primary visual cortex",
            "study_system": "mouse primary visual cortex",
            "taxonomic_level": "PV+ interneurons",
            "scope_population": "PV+ to pyramidal neuron connections",
            "value_source_sentence": "Individual PV+ cells strongly inhibit those pyramidal cells that provide them with strong excitation and share their visual selectivity.",
            "experimental_conditions": "in vivo, combined visual response and connectivity measurement"
          },
          {
            "n": 0,
            "doi": "10.1093/cercor/bhx276",
            "value": "Nonselective connections with both projection subtypes",
            "method": "paired intracellular recordings",
            "metric": "PV/FS connectivity selectivity for pyramidal subtypes",
            "n_analyzed": "",
            "ci_or_error": "",
            "text_access": "fulltext",
            "n_definition": "paired recordings between identified cell types",
            "scope_region": "frontal cortex layer 5",
            "study_system": "rat frontal cortex layer 5",
            "taxonomic_level": "FS/PV cells",
            "scope_population": "FS cells to CPn and CCS pyramidal subtypes",
            "value_source_sentence": "FS cells made nonselective connections with both projection subtypes.",
            "experimental_conditions": "in vitro paired recordings, identified projection subtypes"
          },
          {
            "n": 0,
            "doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.5158-11.2012",
            "value": "85-114 μm Gaussian sigma, comparable for all types",
            "method": "multiple intracellular recordings",
            "metric": "Connectivity spread FS vs excitatory cells",
            "n_analyzed": "",
            "ci_or_error": "",
            "text_access": "abstract_only",
            "n_definition": "multiple intracellular recording distance-connectivity mapping",
            "scope_region": "primary auditory cortex",
            "study_system": "mouse primary auditory cortex",
            "taxonomic_level": "FS, non-FS, and excitatory neurons",
            "scope_population": "all cell types in thalamorecipient layer",
            "value_source_sentence": "The spread of connectivity, parameterized by Gaussian fits to the data, was comparable for all cell types, ranging from 85 to 114 μm.",
            "experimental_conditions": "in vitro, multiple intracellular recordings"
          }
        ],
        "comparison_id": "blanket-vs-selective-inhibition-evidence",
        "comparison_name": "Blanket vs Selective Inhibition: Evidence Across Studies",
        "comparison_type": "cross-study conflict",
        "what_it_reveals": "The evidence reveals a nuanced picture where PV connectivity is anatomically dense but functionally tuned. Connection probability may be high (blanket-like) but synaptic weights are modulated by activity and co-tuning, creating selective inhibition within a framework of dense connectivity. Whether PV inhibition appears selective or nonselective may depend on the level of analysis (connectivity vs synaptic weight), brain region, and experimental conditions.",
        "homogeneity_check": {
          "caveats": [
            "Different brain regions (visual, auditory, frontal cortex)",
            "Different species (mouse, rat)",
            "Different experimental approaches (in vivo vs in vitro)",
            "Blanket/selective distinction measured at different levels: connectivity rate vs synaptic weight"
          ],
          "n_definition_uniform": "false",
          "scope_region_uniform": "false",
          "taxonomic_level_uniform": "true",
          "scope_population_uniform": "false"
        },
        "suggested_plot_type": "heatmap"
      },
      "section_id": "section_07_evidence_package",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewPV/blob/df9fc7e8d455b084152c9d713558dae0013cef21/evidence/section_07_evidence_package.json",
      "target_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewpv-07",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewPV",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewpv-07",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_07_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [
        "paper:paper-0a3cf7627c63",
        "paper:paper-7ab8027f125a",
        "paper:paper-aa18bb0de98d",
        "paper:paper-f74b0ebd1b13"
      ],
      "section_title": "Local Circuit Motifs: Perisomatic Inhibition, Feedback, and Feedforward",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "df9fc7e8d455b084152c9d713558dae0013cef21",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewPV"
      },
      "generation_status": "complete",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-e6261c8263e7",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewPV/blob/df9fc7e8d455b084152c9d713558dae0013cef21/evidence/section_07_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "df9fc7e8d455b084152c9d713558dae0013cef21",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewPV"
    }