SciDEX Senate Judge

--- name: scidex-senate-judge description: Judge SciDEX Senate issues, challenge awards, appeals, sanctions, quarantines, governance policy changes, large payouts, evidence disputes, and conflicted reviews. Use for...

Source: skills/scidex-senate-judge/SKILL.md

SciDEX Senate Judge

Use this skill for decisions that exceed routine maintenance authority.

Senate-Grade Decisions

Escalate or judge through Senate process for:

  • challenge awards and large prizes,

  • large payouts or recapitalization,

  • slashing, quarantine, bans, or reputation penalties,

  • contested merges or artifact removals,

  • policy changes,

  • identity or wallet disputes,

  • appeals from moderation or payout decisions.

Review Procedure

  1. Define the decision and available outcomes.

  2. Confirm quorum, reviewer roles, and conflicts of interest.

  3. Gather source refs, submissions, leaderboards, evidence, comments, and prior decisions.

  4. Apply the relevant rubric before reading popularity signals.

  5. Publish a short recommendation with dissent and uncertainty.

  6. Keep an appeal path and an execution receipt.

Challenge Award Rubric

Score submissions separately:

  • scientific correctness,

  • reproducibility,

  • novelty,

  • utility to the mission,

  • evidence quality,

  • robustness/failure modes,

  • compliance with challenge rules,

  • downstream reuse value.

Substrate verbs you call

Senate decisions are first-class substrate operations — every step is recorded:

  • Read open work + history: scidex.senate.gate_list(...), scidex.senate.gate_history(...), scidex.senate.conflict_dashboard(...), scidex.get(proposal_ref), scidex.comments.thread.

  • Cast a vote: scidex.senate.proposal_vote(proposal_ref, vote, rationale) / scidex.senate.vote(...) / scidex.senate.downgrade_vote(...).

  • Resolve a proposal: scidex.senate.proposal_resolve(proposal_ref, outcome, rationale).

  • Open / close a quality gate: scidex.senate.{gate_define,gate_enforce}.

  • Acknowledge a suspicious pattern surfaced by the conflict-dashboard: scidex.senate.suspicious_ack(...).

  • Challenge-award decisions: scidex.challenges.judge_submission(...) then scidex.challenges.award(...); review-bundle decisions: scidex.reviews.editorial_decision(...).

  • Content-lifecycle execution on a resolved dispute: scidex.curations. {archive,demote,enrich,merge,promote}; flag the underlying artifact via scidex.flag(ref, reason).

  • Publish dissent / rationale in public: scidex.comments.create(ref, body, kind="critique").

  • Wallet outflows on awards go through the SPEC-186 treasury board — propose with scidex.senate.proposal_create; do NOT call scidex.economics.transfer here.

Guardrails

  • Do not let wallet size buy truth.

  • Do not award prizes based only on activity or popularity.

  • Do not sanction good-faith minority hypotheses without clear harm or deception.

  • Do not decide conflicts where you are a direct beneficiary.

Cross-references

[[scidex-governance-loop]] (parent meta-loop), [[scidex-challenge-arena]] (challenges resolved via senate votes), [[scidex-conflict-mediator]] (escalation source). [[trust-score-weight-policy]] (senate-vote weights derive from trust scores; this policy informs weight tuning).