Details

scope
Mouse V1 (visual cortex); layer L2/3
claim_text
The reconstructed mouse V1 L2/3 excitatory network in Lee et al. 2016 displayed modularity (0.55) significantly above random (0.50) by permutation test.
section_id
section_06
source_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_06_evidence_package.json
effect_size
Modularity Q = 0.55 ± 0.003 (data) vs. 0.50 ± 0.009 (null)
review_repo
ComputationalReviewRecurrence
section_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-06-connectomic-micons
source_kind
review_finding
source_path
evidence/section_06_evidence_package.json
source_span
Modularity in the reconstructed network was significantly higher than would be expected by chance (= 0.55 ± .003 vs. 0.50 ± .009, mean ± SD,≈ 0, Permutation test;and, see Methods) and was not a consequence of higher order motifs ().
study_system
Mouse V1 (visual cortex); layer L2/3
section_title
6. Connectomic resolution — MICrONS mouse V1/HVA millimetre-scale EM volume; pyramidal-pyramidal wiring statistics derived from it; reconciliation with paired-recording estimates
evidence_summary
Modularity index applied to graph of 201 core neurons (degree ≥ 2) from 1278 reconstructed targets; permutation null.
review_bundle_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9
replication_status
replication_unknown
review_package_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9
source_artifact_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-06-connectomic-micons
origin_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_06_evidence_package.json
commit_sha
79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f
created_by
persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience
repository_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence
Raw fields (4)
raw_fields
{
  "n": 201,
  "doi": "10.1038/nature17192",
  "claim": "The reconstructed mouse V1 L2/3 excitatory network in Lee et al. 2016 displayed modularity (0.55) significantly above random (0.50) by permutation test.",
  "cite_key": "Lee2016",
  "evidence": "Modularity index applied to graph of 201 core neurons (degree ≥ 2) from 1278 reconstructed targets; permutation null.",
  "effect_size": "Modularity Q = 0.55 ± 0.003 (data) vs. 0.50 ± 0.009 (null)",
  "text_access": "fulltext",
  "study_system": "Mouse V1 (visual cortex); layer L2/3",
  "argument_role": "supporting",
  "replication_status": "replication_unknown",
  "claim_source_sentence": "Modularity in the reconstructed network was significantly higher than would be expected by chance (= 0.55 ± .003 vs. 0.50 ± .009, mean ± SD,≈ 0, Permutation test;and, see Methods) and was not a consequence of higher order motifs ().",
  "source_provenance_status": "ok",
  "replication_evidence_dois": [],
  "effect_size_source_sentence": "Modularity in the reconstructed network was significantly higher than would be expected by chance (= 0.55 ± .003 vs. 0.50 ± .009, mean ± SD,≈ 0, Permutation test;and, see Methods) and was not a consequence of higher order motifs ()."
}
source_refs
[
  "paper:paper-d2a8c6775359"
]
evidence_refs
[
  {
    "ref": "paper:paper-d2a8c6775359"
  }
]
source_policy
{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
}

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.