Translaminar excitatory loops in mouse: L4→L2/3→L5→L6→L4 within the column; asymmetry of forward and backward intracortical projections
This section is represented as a source-backed SciDEX wiki artifact. The full source remains in the original computational-review repository.
Source: https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/content/04_translaminar.md
Citation anchors captured: 282
Citation contexts
-
1CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1 Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3 Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in{ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of 3CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9, where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column’s strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa... -
4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 4CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 5CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by 6CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9, who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-... -
7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources 7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,... -
7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources 7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,... -
7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources 7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,... -
7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources 7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,... -
7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources 7CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,... -
8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources 8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,... -
8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 Cross-study coverage of translaminar E→E pathways in mouse cortex. Categorical encoding of five canonical translaminar pathways (L4→L2/3, L2/3→L5, L5-IT→L2/3, L4→L5, L6→L4) across paired-recording 8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3, glutamate-uncaging 8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4, two-photon optogenetic 8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5, 2P optomapping 8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 and EM connectomic 8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7 datasets spanning mouse S1, vM1, vS1, S2 and V1 + HVAs. Panel a classifies ea... -
8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 Cross-study coverage of translaminar E→E pathways in mouse cortex. Categorical encoding of five canonical translaminar pathways (L4→L2/3, L2/3→L5, L5-IT→L2/3, L4→L5, L6→L4) across paired-recording 8CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9, glutamate-uncaging 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0, two-photon optogenetic 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1, 2P optomapping 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2 and EM connectomic 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3 datasets spanning mouse S1, vM1, vS1, S2 and V1 + HVAs. Panel a classifies ea... -
9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 Cross-study coverage of translaminar E→E pathways in mouse cortex. Categorical encoding of five canonical translaminar pathways (L4→L2/3, L2/3→L5, L5-IT→L2/3, L4→L5, L6→L4) across paired-recording 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5, glutamate-uncaging 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6, two-photon optogenetic 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7, 2P optomapping 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8 and EM connectomic 9CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9 datasets spanning mouse S1, vM1, vS1, S2 and V1 + HVAs. Panel a classifies ea... -
10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference0 Cross-study coverage of translaminar E→E pathways in mouse cortex. Categorical encoding of five canonical translaminar pathways (L4→L2/3, L2/3→L5, L5-IT→L2/3, L4→L5, L6→L4) across paired-recording 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference1, glutamate-uncaging 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference2, two-photon optogenetic 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference3, 2P optomapping 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference4 and EM connectomic 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference5 datasets spanning mouse S1, vM1, vS1, S2 and V1 + HVAs. Panel a classifies ea... -
10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference6 Cross-study coverage of translaminar E→E pathways in mouse cortex. Categorical encoding of five canonical translaminar pathways (L4→L2/3, L2/3→L5, L5-IT→L2/3, L4→L5, L6→L4) across paired-recording 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference7, glutamate-uncaging 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference8, two-photon optogenetic 10CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference9, 2P optomapping 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference00 and EM connectomic 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference01 datasets spanning mouse S1, vM1, vS1, S2 and V1 + HVAs. Panel a classifies ea... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference02 Quantitative weight of L5-IT→L2/3 vs L4→L2/3 into L2/3 pyramidal cells. 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference03 observe strong excitatory input from L5 intratelencephalic neurons onto V1 L2/3 pyramidal cells alongside the canonical L4 source, while the original C2 barrel-column paired-recording matrix 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference04 reports L4 as the column’s strongest excitatory presynaptic source and does not separately quantify a strong L5-IT contribution.... -
2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}
sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference05 Quantitative weight of L5-IT→L2/3 vs L4→L2/3 into L2/3 pyramidal cells. 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference06 observe strong excitatory input from L5 intratelencephalic neurons onto V1 L2/3 pyramidal cells alongside the canonical L4 source, while the original C2 barrel-column paired-recording matrix 2CitationPairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}sec-paired-recording, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...content/04_translaminar.md:line 4Open reference07 reports L4 as the column’s strongest excitatory presynaptic source and does not separately quantify a strong L5-IT contribution.... -
... 232 additional anchors in refs_json
References
- [Lefort2009] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Hooks2011] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Hooks2013] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Anderson2010] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Hage2022] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Chou2025] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Ding2025] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [TheMICrONSConsortium2025] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Weiler2008] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Bureau2006] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Petreanu2007] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Petreanu2009] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Adesnik2010] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Olsen2012] “Pairwise excitatory connection probabilities and unitary EPSPs, the unit measurements catalogued in {ref}`sec-paired-recording`, only become a description of cortical architecture when they are assembled into the inter-layer loops they imply. The most-cited assembly is the textbook canonical microcircuit — thalamic input arrives in L4, ascends into L2/3, descends into L5, and closes through L6 back onto L4 — and in...”
- [Cossell2015] “The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of [Lefort2009], where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column's strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa...”
- [Ko2011] “The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of [Lefort2009], where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column's strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa...”
- [Meyer2018] “The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of [Lefort2009], where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column's strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa...”
- [Jouhanneau2015] “The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of [Lefort2009], where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column's strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa...”
- [Jouhanneau2019] “The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of [Lefort2009], where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column's strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa...”
- [Campagnola2022] “The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of [Lefort2009], where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column's strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa...”
- [Joshi2015] “The benchmark for the within-column matrix is the C2 barrel column dataset of [Lefort2009], where multiple simultaneous whole-cell recordings sampled connections systematically across all six layers and reported that connection probability and EPSP amplitude depend strongly on the laminar position of both pre- and postsynaptic cell, with presynaptic L4 providing the column's strongest excitatory drive. Subsequent pa...”
- [Katzel2011] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [Kiritani2012] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [Suter2015] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [Yamawaki2021] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [Yamawaki2014] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [Bortone2014] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [VelezFort2014] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [Frandolig2019] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [Crandall2017] “Whether the same matrix repeats across cortical areas was first answered systematically in vibrissal M1, vibrissal S1 and S2 by [Hooks2011], who used laser-scanning photostimulation to map laminar input fields onto pyramidal neurons in each area and reported that the L2/3→L5 descending pathway was the most conserved feature across the three areas while L4→L2/3 and L6-related pathways were the most variable, a cross-...”
- [VargasOrtiz2025] “V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources [Hage2022]. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,...”
- [Meng2020] “V1 has been the principal arena for re-measuring the translaminar matrix with techniques that scale beyond the multi-patch limit. Two-photon holographic stimulation paired with whole-cell recording reports a heterogeneous excitatory input pattern onto L2/3 pyramidal cells in which L4 excitatory neurons and intralaminar interneurons are the most common sources [Hage2022]. A subsequent 2P optomapping study sampled 30,...”
Sister wikis (recently updated · no domain on this page)
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- test
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- Design Brief: Beta-test Evaluation Protocol for SciDEX v2 Design Trajectories
- Andy — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
- Kris — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
Recent activity here
No recent events touching this page.