- claim_text
Two-photon optogenetic activation of small ensembles in mouse V1 produces matched suppression of the surrounding network, preserving the balance of activation and suppression — direct evidence of the distributed-suppression signature predicted by strongly coupled recurrent E-I cortical networks.
- raw_fields
{
"n": 12,
"doi": "10.7554/elife.58889",
"claim": "Two-photon optogenetic activation of small ensembles in mouse V1 produces matched suppression of the surrounding network, preserving the balance of activation and suppression — direct evidence of the distributed-suppression signature predicted by strongly coupled recurrent E-I cortical networks.",
"cite_key": "Dalgleish2020",
"evidence": "Two-photon holographic photoactivation of 1–200 mouse V1 L2/3 pyramidal cells during a behavioral detection task with simultaneous two-photon imaging of network responses.",
"effect_size": "200-neuron d-prime 2.39 ± 0.86; 100-neuron d-prime 2.13 ± 0.93; matched suppression maintains spontaneous balance",
"text_access": "fulltext",
"study_system": "Mouse V1 L2/3, awake behaving; two-photon holographic optogenetics + two-photon calcium imaging",
"argument_role": "supporting",
"replication_status": "within_lab",
"claim_source_sentence": "We also demonstrate that while detection rates increase with increasing stimulation, the surrounding network responds with matched suppression which maintains the balance of activation and suppression at a level consistent with spontaneous epochs.",
"source_provenance_status": "ok",
"replication_evidence_dois": [
"10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.010"
],
"effect_size_source_sentence": "We found that animals reliably detected 2P photostimulation of both 200 and 100 neurons consistently across time, from the first session (first 200 neuron d-prime: 2.39 ± 0.86 vs 1, p=1.70 × 10paired t-test; first 100 neuron d-prime: 2.13 ± 0.93 vs 1, p=1.4 × 10paired t-test,= 12 mice) to the last session (last 200 neuron d-prime: 2.83 ± 0.62 vs 1, p=5.95 × 10paired t-test; last 100 neuron d-prime: 2.55 ± 0.7 vs 1, p=1.00 × 10paired t-test,= 12 mice) and only showed a modest improvement over time."
}- source_refs
[
"paper:paper-d2118dd5013a"
]
- source_span
We also demonstrate that while detection rates increase with increasing stimulation, the surrounding network responds with matched suppression which maintains the balance of activation and suppression at a level consistent with spontaneous epochs.
- evidence_refs
[
{
"ref": "paper:paper-d2118dd5013a"
}
]- source_policy
{
"mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
"notes": [
"Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
"SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
],
"source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
"source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
}