Quantitative receptive-field characterization of mouse V1 with multi-channel si…

Quantitative receptive-field characterization of mouse V1 with multi-channel silicon probes shows that, despite spatial scales being 1-2 orders of magnitude coarser than primate, mouse V1 neurons exhibit orientation and spatial-frequency selectivity comparable to other species, and have laminar- and cell-type-correlated simple- vs complex-cell linear-summation properties and contrast-invariant tuning — validating the mouse as a model for cortical sensory processing.

{
  "n": 0,
  "doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.0623-08.2008",
  "claim": "Quantitative receptive-field characterization of mouse V1 with multi-channel silicon probes shows that, despite spatial scales being 1-2 orders of magnitude coarser than primate, mouse V1 neurons exhibit orientation and spatial-frequency selectivity comparable to other species, and have laminar- and cell-type-correlated simple- vs complex-cell linear-summation properties and contrast-invariant tuning — validating the mouse as a model for cortical sensory processing.",
  "cite_key": "Niell2008",
  "evidence": "Multi-channel silicon-electrode array extracellular recordings with current-source density laminar localization and spike-waveform classification in anesthetized adult mouse V1.",
  "effect_size": "qualitative — orientation/spatial-frequency selectivity and simple/complex-cell structure present in mouse V1",
  "text_access": "abstract_only",
  "study_system": "anesthetized adult mouse primary visual cortex (V1)",
  "argument_role": "supporting",
  "replication_status": "independently_replicated",
  "claim_source_sentence": "although the spatial scale of mouse receptive fields is up to one or two orders of magnitude larger, neurons show selectivity for stimulus parameters such as orientation and spatial frequency that is near to that found in other species. Furthermore, typical response properties such as linear versus nonlinear spatial summation (i.e., simple and complex cells) and contrast-invariant tuning are also present in mouse V1 and correlate with laminar position and cell type",
  "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match",
  "replication_evidence_dois": [
    "10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.004"
  ],
  "effect_size_source_sentence": "neurons show selectivity for stimulus parameters such as orientation and spatial frequency that is near to that found in other species"
}

[
  "paper:paper-a9a3a4797f89"
]

although the spatial scale of mouse receptive fields is up to one or two orders of magnitude larger, neurons show selectivity for stimulus parameters such as orientation and spatial frequency that is near to that found in other species. Furthermore, typical response properties such as linear versus nonlinear spatial summation (i.e., simple and complex cells) and contrast-invariant tuning are also present in mouse V1...

[
  {
    "ref": "paper:paper-a9a3a4797f89"
  }
]

{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
}